The cumulative percentage of eyes reaching each postoperative far-vision threshold for uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA).

More eyes reaching the better acuity thresholds indicates stronger distance performance. A smaller separation between UDVA and CDVA means uncorrected vision approaches the eye's best corrected potential.

State the test distance, chart, luminance, correction, follow-up, and whether results represent eyes or subjects. Use standardized acuity notation and define exclusions or adverse-event outliers.

The cumulative percentage of eyes attaining each near-vision threshold for uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) and distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) at the stated distance.

Higher cumulative attainment at better acuity levels indicates stronger functional near performance. The relationship between UNVA and DCNVA helps distinguish spectacle-free near vision from distance-corrected near capacity.

Report the exact near distance and luminance, use a standardized logMAR or validated ETDRS-equivalent test, and prefer DCNVA over near acuity measured through an added positive lens.

The cumulative percentage of eyes reaching each intermediate-vision threshold for uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA).

Greater attainment at better thresholds indicates stronger intermediate function. Comparing UIVA with DCIVA shows how much performance is available without correction versus with the far focus corrected.

Intermediate outcomes are distance-dependent. Specify the exact presentation distance, chart and luminance, use standardized acuity notation, and prefer DCIVA rather than acuity measured with an added lens.

The percentage of eyes grouped by the postoperative Snellen-line difference between UDVA and CDVA, from several lines worse through the same or better uncorrected acuity.

A distribution concentrated at “same” or only one line worse indicates that uncorrected distance vision is close to best corrected vision. This normalizes efficacy to the sample's measured visual potential.

Define the direction and width of line-difference bins and use the same visit, cohort, chart, distance, and luminance for UDVA and CDVA. Clearly label whether the unit is eyes or subjects.

The distribution of postoperative manifest-refraction spherical-equivalent prediction error relative to the intended refractive target, including the percentage within clinically relevant dioptric limits.

A narrow distribution centered near 0 D indicates accurate and consistent targeting. Displacement toward negative or positive values suggests a systematic myopic or hyperopic shift, subject to the stated sign convention.

Report the IOL formula, constant, biometer, constant optimization, intended target, and mean postoperative spherical equivalent. Refraction should be adjusted to optical infinity before comparison.

The percentage of eyes within successive magnitudes of postoperative refractive cylinder, showing how residual astigmatism is distributed after surgery.

A larger proportion at low cylinder thresholds, particularly ≤0.50 D and ≤1.00 D, indicates less residual astigmatic blur. Magnitude alone does not reveal axis-related or directional error.

State the follow-up, refraction method, notation and thresholds. When toric accuracy is evaluated, complement this magnitude plot with double-angle vector analysis and corneal-plane conversion where appropriate.

Mean contrast sensitivity in logCS across spatial frequencies under photopic conditions without glare. Error bars show uncertainty or sample variation, and the shaded region provides an age-matched reference range.

Higher logCS indicates better detection of low-contrast detail. The curve should be interpreted frequency by frequency and against a reference range matched to the same testing conditions and approximate patient age.

Report distance, vergence correction, chart luminance, ambient light, correction state, and monocular or binocular testing. Define error bars as SD or 95% CI and cite the source of the normal range.

Mean corrected-distance visual acuity in logMAR across a sequence of added defocus lenses, with error bars and area-under-the-curve summaries for total, far, intermediate, and near ranges.

Lower logMAR values indicate better acuity. A broad, relatively low curve suggests a wider functional range of focus; range-specific AUCs summarize performance below the selected acuity criterion.

Correct manifest refraction to infinity and account for test-distance vergence. Report lens range and step, luminance, chart-randomization method, eye or subject unit, and whether error bars are SD or 95% CI.

A double-angle Cartesian display of astigmatic vectors, preserving both magnitude and axis. Individual observations, their vector mean or centroid, and confidence ellipses show location and spread.

A centroid nearer the origin indicates a smaller mean vector error, while its axis identifies directional bias. Tighter clustering indicates greater consistency; doubling keeps clinically adjacent axes such as 1° and 179° together.

Analyze right and left eyes separately or mirror left-eye data about 90° before pooling. Report centroid magnitude and axis, spread and 95% confidence ellipse, coordinate convention, and appropriate bivariate statistics.